With whom Oblomov was friends. The relationship between Oblomov and Stolz. Farewell to home

In the novel "Oblomov" Ivan Alexandrovich Goncharov wanted to oppose Western and Russian culture. Oblomov and Stolz - two key images works. The novel is built on the reception of antithesis. It is realized through the opposition of these two characters of the work. In many ways, Stolz and Oblomov are opposite. In Russian classical literature there are many works constructed in this way. These are, for example, "A Hero of Our Time" and "Eugene Onegin". Such examples can also be found in foreign literature.

"Oblomov" and "Don Quixote"

With "Oblomov" the novel "Don Quixote" by Miguel de Cervantes most of all echoes. This work describes the contradictions between reality and a person's idea of what an ideal life should be like. This contradiction extends, as in Oblomov, to external world. Like Ilya Ilyich, Hidalgo is immersed in dreams. Oblomov in the work is surrounded by people who do not understand him, because their ideas about the world are limited to its material side. True, these two stories have a diametrically opposite outcome: before his death, an insight comes to Alonso. This character understands that he was mistaken in his dreams. But Oblomov does not change. Obviously, this outcome is the difference between the Western and Russian mentality.

Antithesis - the main technique in the work

With the help of antithesis, it is possible to draw the personalities of the characters more voluminously, since everything is known in comparison. It is impossible to understand Ilya Ilyich by removing Stolz from the novel. Goncharov shows the strengths and weaknesses of his characters. At the same time, the reader can look from the outside at himself and his inner world. This will help to avoid the mistakes that the characters Oblomov and Stolz made in Goncharov's novel Oblomov.

Ilya Ilyich is a man with a primordially Russian soul, and Andrey Stolz is a representative of a new era. In Russia, there have always been and will be both. Stolz and Oblomov are characters through whose interaction, as well as through their interaction with other heroes of the work, the author conveys the main thoughts. Olga Ilyinskaya is the link between them.

The value of childhood in the formation of the characters' characters

Childhood in the life of every person is of great importance. Personality in this period is not yet formed. A person, like a sponge, absorbs everything that he offers. the world. It is in childhood that upbringing takes place, on which depends what a person will become in adult life. Therefore, an important role in Goncharov's novel is played by the description of childhood and the upbringing of future antipodes, which are Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stoltz. In the chapter "Oblomov's Dream" the author gives a description of Ilya Ilyich's childhood. He recalls Oblomovka, his native village. After reading this chapter, we understand where immobility and laziness appeared in the character of this hero.

Childhood of Ilya Oblomov

Stolz and Oblomov were brought up differently. Ilyusha is like a future master. Many guests and relatives lived in his parents' house. They all praised and caressed little Ilyusha. He was exquisitely and a lot fed with "cream", "rusks", "buns". Food, it should be noted, was the main concern in Oblomovka. She spent a lot of time. The whole family decided what dishes would be for dinner or lunch. After dinner, everyone fell into a long sleep. So the days passed: food and sleep. When Ilya grew up, he was sent to study at the gymnasium. Parents were not interested in Ilyusha's knowledge. They were only interested in a certificate that he had gone through various sciences and arts. Therefore, Ilya Oblomov grew up as an uneducated, downtrodden boy, but kind at heart.

The childhood of Andrei Stolz

Stolz, on the other hand, is just the opposite. Andrei's father, a German by nationality, raised independence in his son from an early age. In relation to his child, he was dry. Purposefulness and rigor are the main features that his parents invested in Andrei's upbringing. All family days were spent at work. When the boy grew up, his father began to take him to the market, in the field, forced him to work. At the same time, he taught his son the sciences, the German language. Then Stolz began to send the child to the city on errands. Goncharov notes that it never happened that Andrei forgot something, overlooked it, changed it, made a mistake. The Russian noblewoman, the boy's mother, taught him literature, gave spiritual education to her son. As a result, Stolz became a smart, strong young man.

Farewell to home

Let us turn to the scenes that describe how Stolz and Oblomov left their native villages. Oblomov is seen off with tears in their eyes, they do not want to let go of their dear child - there is an atmosphere of love for the boy. And when native home leaves Stolz, his father only gives him a few instructions regarding spending Money. At the moment of parting, they even have nothing to say to each other.

Two environments, two characters and their influence on each other

Two completely different environments are the villages of Oblomovka and Verkhlevo. Oblomovka is a kind of heaven on Earth. Nothing happens here, everything is calm and quiet. Andrey's father, a German, is in power in Verkhlevo, who arranges the German order here.

Oblomov and Stolz have common character traits. Their friendship, which existed since childhood, led to the fact that, communicating, they influenced each other to some extent. Both characters were brought up together for some time. They went to school, supported by Andrei's father. However, they came here, one might say, from a completely different worlds: once and for all established, undisturbed order of life in the village of Oblomovka; and the active work of a German burgher, which was interspersed with the lessons of his mother, who tried to instill in Andrei an interest and love for art.

For the further development of relations, however, Andrei and Ilya lack communication. Gradually moving away from each other, growing up, Oblomov and Stolz. Their friendship, meanwhile, does not stop. However, it is also hampered by the fact that the property status of these two heroes is different. The real gentleman, the nobleman is Oblomov. This is the owner of 300 souls. Ilya could do nothing at all, being on the provision of his serfs. Everything is different with Stolz, who was a Russian nobleman only by his mother. He had to maintain his material well-being on his own.

Oblomov and Stolz in the novel "Oblomov" in their mature years became completely different. It was already difficult for them to communicate. Stolz began to taunt and make fun of Ilya's reasoning, which was so far from reality. Differences in character and outlook on life eventually led to a gradual weakening of their friendship.

The meaning of friendship in Goncharov

The red thread in this novel is the thought of friendship, of the role it plays in a person's life. A person in interaction with others can show his true essence. Friendship has many forms: "brotherhood", sung by Pushkin, selfish, friendship for one reason or another. Except sincere, in essence, all the rest are just forms of egoism. Andrei and Ilya had a strong friendship. She connected them, as we have already noted, since childhood. Roman Goncharova helps readers understand why Oblomov and Stolz are friends, what role friendship plays in a person’s life, due to the fact that it describes many of its ups and downs.

The meaning and relevance of the novel "Oblomov"

The novel "Oblomov" is a work that does not lose its relevance to this day, since it reflects the essence of people's lives, which is eternal. The antithesis proposed by the author (his portrait is presented below) perfectly conveys the essence of rock in the history of our country, which is marked by these two extremes.

It is difficult for a Russian person to find a middle ground, to mix the desire for well-being, the activity and diligence of Andrei Stolz and Oblomov's broad soul, full of wisdom and light. Probably, in each of our compatriots, as well as in our country itself, these extremes live: Stolz and Oblomov. The characterization of Russia's future depends on which of them will prevail.

Introduction
Conclusion

Introduction

Reasons for friendship between Stolz and Oblomov

The friendship between Oblomov and Stolz began during their school years. At the time of their acquaintance, the characters were similar in character and had common hobbies. Little Ilya is depicted as a curious child who was interested in many things. He wanted to learn about the world around him and learn as much as possible of the new, even as a young man he was still preparing for the fact that his life would “take on other, wider dimensions”, he was full of various aspirations and hopes, preparing for an important role in society.
However, due to the "hothouse", "Oblomov" upbringing and the influence of relatives, the hero remains in place, continuing only to hope and plan, never moving on to action. All Oblomov's activity passes into the world of dreams and dreams, which he himself invents and lives by.

Little Andrei Stoltz was just as curious a child as Ilya, but he was not limited in his knowledge of the world and was even allowed to leave home for a few days. And if in Oblomov upbringing killed an active, active principle, then the formation of Stolz's personality was influenced by the death of his mother, who dearly loved her son. A strict, unemotional father could not give his son all the love and warmth that he lost after the loss of his mother. Apparently, it was this event, coupled with the need, by order of his father, to leave for another city and build a career on his own, made a strong impression on young Andrei Ivanovich. Mature Stoltz is a person who finds it very difficult to understand his feelings, moreover, he does not understand love, since he cannot grasp it with a rational mind. That is why many researchers compare Andrey Ivanovich with an insensitive mechanism, which is fundamentally wrong - in fact, Stolz, no less sincere and a kind person than Oblomov (remember how often and absolutely disinterestedly he helps a friend), but all his sensuality is hidden deep inside his soul, incomprehensible and inaccessible even to the hero himself.

The relationship between Stolz and Oblomov begins as a friendship of two personalities very similar in nature and character, but different upbringing makes them completely different and even opposing characters, who, nevertheless, continue to see in each other that important and close that brought them together in school years.

Features of friendship between Oblomov and Stolz in adulthood

Stolz, at any opportunity, tries to “stir up”, activate Oblomov, force him to act “now or never”, while Ilya Ilyich gradually, unconsciously for both heroes, instills in a friend those same “Oblomov” values that Andrei Ivanovich was so afraid of and to which in eventually came - to a calm, measured, monotonous family life.

Conclusion

The theme of friendship in the novel "Oblomov" is revealed on the example of the relationship between two opposing characters. However, the differences between Oblomov and Stolz are only external in nature, since both of them are individuals who are in constant search of their own happiness, but have not been able to fully open up and realize their full potential. The images of the heroes are tragic, since neither the active Stolz, who is constantly striving forward, nor the passive, living in the illusions of Oblomov, find harmony between the two main principles - rational and sensual, which leads to the death of Ilya Ilyich and internal confusion and even greater confusion of Stolz.

Introduction The reasons for the friendship between Stolz and Oblomov Features of the friendship between Oblomov and Stolz in their mature years Conclusion

Introduction

The central characters of the novel "Oblomov" are Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrei Ivanovich Stolz. In the work, the characters are depicted as individuals with opposite characteristics and leading a multidirectional lifestyle. However, despite the outward dissimilarity of the characters of the characters, the friendship of Oblomov and Stolz lasted for many years, being not only mutually pleasant, but also useful for both.

The characters are a phenomenon.

Reasons for friendship between Stolz and Oblomov

He wanted to learn about the world around him and learn as much new things as possible, even as a young man he was still preparing for the fact that his life would “take on other, wider dimensions”, he was full of various aspirations and hopes, preparing for an important role in society.
However, due to the “hothouse”, “Oblomov” upbringing and the influence of relatives, the hero remains in place, continuing only to hope and plan, never moving on to action. All Oblomov's activity passes into the world of dreams and dreams, which he himself invents and lives by.

Apparently, it was this event, coupled with the need, by order of his father, to leave for another city and build a career on his own, made a strong impression on young Andrei Ivanovich. Mature Stoltz is a person who finds it very difficult to understand his feelings, moreover, he does not understand love, since he cannot grasp it with a rational mind. That is why many researchers compare Andrei Ivanovich with an insensitive mechanism, which is fundamentally wrong - in fact, Stolz is no less sincere and kind person than Oblomov (remember how often and absolutely disinterestedly he helps a friend), but all his sensuality is hidden deep inside his soul, incomprehensible and inaccessible even to the hero himself.

Features of friendship between Oblomov and Stolz in adulthood

The relationship between Stolz and Oblomov in adulthood remains as trusting and necessary for the heroes as in childhood or adolescence. Fleeing from real life into the beautiful world of illusions, Ilya Ilyich and the rational, controlling, active Andrei Ivanovich find in a friend those traits and qualities that they cannot reveal in themselves. Their friendship is built not only on mutual understanding and empathy, but also on the mutual help of the characters to each other.

Stolz, at any opportunity, tries to “stir up”, activate Oblomov, force him to act “now or never”, while Ilya Ilyich gradually, unconsciously for both heroes, instills in a friend those very “Oblomov” values that Andrei Ivanovich was so afraid of and to which in eventually came - to a calm, measured, monotonous family life.

Conclusion

(No Ratings Yet)

In the novel "Oblomov" Ivan Alexandrovich Goncharov subjects human relationships to a subtle analysis, explores and reveals the theme of friendship between people. Can they be friends perfectly? different people? The author tremblingly reflects on this problem. The writer reveals this idea through the main characters of the novel: Andrei Ivanovich Stolz and Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. Some critics believed that Stolz was the antipode of Oblomov, his complete [...] ...
Composition of the author Goncharov I A - Oblomov and Stolz in the novel by I. a. Goncharov "Oblomov" Sharp oppositions permeate the entire work of I. A. Goncharov from the first to the last chapter. The reception of antithesis, on which the novel is built, helps to better reveal the characters of the characters, to reveal the author's intention. About such friends as Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrey Ivanovich Stolz, A. […]...
Oblomov's dispute with his antipode, Stolz, takes place in part 2 of Goncharov's novel, in chapter 4. The action takes place at Oblomov's house, after a week of busy life and traveling around the city with Andrey. All this fuss that Stoltz brought into the life of Ilya Ilyich greatly tired him. Once, unable to stand it, he “especially rebelled against this fuss.” Oblomov mercilessly asserts […]
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is a gentleman who was brought up in the patriarchal environment of the family estate. “What is Oblomovism?”; the main idea is that Ilya Ilyich is a natural person, and Oblomovism is an artificial, incorrect world that disfigured the life of both Oblomov himself and those people who fell into this world. Oblomov did no harm to anyone, he lived his life like a child. Oblomov product “three hundred […]...
The works of I. A. Goncharov were widely known among readers. The novel “Oblomov” was and is especially popular. The main characters of the novel "Oblomov" are Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and Andrei Stolts. Ilya Ilyich is a Russian landowner who lives in St. Petersburg on income received from the estate. Oblomov is a man "about thirty-two or three years old, of medium height, of pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes." This is […]...
The novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” draws a comprehensive picture of contemporary Russian society for the writer. The author shows its most important aspects - social, philosophical, moral. The patriarchal way of life in Russia was replaced by European capitalism with a completely new psychology and philosophy for a Russian person. Warmth, calmness, comfort and regularity gradually fade into the background, inertia, laziness, hope become dangerous [...] ...
In I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”, Andrey Stolz is the antipode of Oblomov. Every feature of Stolz is a blatant protest against the qualities of Oblomov. The first loves active and interesting life, the second often falls into apathy, he is like a snail that is afraid to get out of its shell. The difference in the characters and life ideals of Oblomov and Stolz was laid in childhood. Stolz received a strict […]
School essay on Russian literature based on the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov”. Andrei Stolz is Oblomov's closest friend, they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people with such different outlooks on life could maintain a deep attachment. Initially, the image of Stolz was conceived as the complete antipode of Oblomov. The author wanted to combine German prudence [...] ...
Oblomov and Stolz comparative characteristics In the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov”, one of the frequent devices is the antithesis. By contrast, the author compares the main character I. I. Oblomov with his childhood friend A. I. Stolz. The first is a real Russian master, and the other is a practical German. Throughout the novel, there are similarities and differences between these two characters. Oblomov [...]
“Oblomov” is a novel by I. A. Goncharov. One of the most significant minor characters of this work is Andrei Stoltz. But what kind of hero is he: positive or negative? I think it's positive. To begin with, consider the relationship between Stolz and the main character - Ilya Oblomov. Ilya Oblomov - The embodiment of apathy and inability to act. Such things cannot be treated well, [...] ...
“... after reading the whole novel, you feel that something new has been added to your sphere of thought, that new images, new types have sunk deep into your soul. They haunt you for a long time, you want to think about them, you want to find out the meaning of their attitude to your own life, character, inclinations ... ”- the well-known critic N. A. Dobrolyubov writes about the novel by I. […]...
What things have become a symbol of "Oblomovism"? The symbols of the “Oblomovism” were a bathrobe, slippers, a sofa. What turned Oblomov into an apathetic couch potato? Laziness, fear of movement and life, inability to practice, the substitution of life with vague dreaminess turned Oblomov from a man into an appendage of a dressing gown and a sofa. What is the function of Oblomov's dream in I. A. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov"? The chapter “Oblomov's Dream” draws an idyll [...] ...
Plan Introduction Differences in the upbringing of Oblomov and Stolz Oblomov's upbringing Stolz's upbringing Such a different feeling of love Conclusion Introduction Goncharova's novel "Oblomov" was written at a turning point for Russian society, when the old feudal, truly Russian foundations were replaced by new, bourgeois, European values. At the time of the creation of the work, the society was divided into two camps - those […]...
Andrei Ivanovich Stolz is a friend of Oblomov, from the time when he studied at a boarding school in Verkhlev. Despite their friendship, Stolz's life turned out completely differently than Oblomov's life. Andrey Stoltz from childhood knew how to set goals for himself, strive for them, and achieve what he wanted. His vision of life can be read in these lines: […]...
In the novel by I. A. Goncharov, Stolz introduces Oblomov to Olga in her house. When he saw her for the first time, he was confused and felt embarrassed. A stormy romance begins between Oblomov and Olga. Oblomov fell in love with Olga, but she pursued her goals. Olga fell in love not with Ilya, but with her dream. Her mission was to wake up the sleeping […]...
Peering into the features of the protagonist of the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” by Andrei Stolz, we see the prototype of a modern business man. But at that time, his image was not clear to the Russian people, and therefore the idea of the creator, to show his people what a person can achieve if desired, failed with a crash. After all, then, the nobility did not burden itself with hard work, its [...] ...
In the novel Oblomov, I. A. Goncharov tries to find answers to those eternal questions that every person asks himself at least once in his life. And one of those multifaceted worlds, the research and understanding of which the writer devoted his work to, is the world of harmony, love, happiness. Love permeates Goncharov's entire novel, filling it with new colors, revealing the most unexpected features of the characters, […]...
Reflection in the novel "Oblomov" of the author's beliefs. (In his best work, on which he worked for ten years, Goncharov displayed those problems of contemporary life that deeply worried him, revealed the causes of these problems. The images of Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz reflect the typical features of the feudal nobility and the emerging class of entrepreneurs. The author novel condemns inactivity, lordly laziness, impotence of the mind and [...] ...
An amazing, grotesque, almost improbable image was created by Goncharov. Oblomov's name has become a household name. To tell the truth, it is the grotesque figures, in which certain features are emphasized and taken beyond the limits of naturalness, that become common nouns. From them come the names of these very traits, features: Hamletism, Don Quixotism, Oblomovism, etc. Oblomov's life is essentially simple. As Dobrolyubov noted, at the beginning of the work we see him [...] ...
At first it will be long and detailed description lazy life and lazy surroundings. Then, like a fresh wind, Stolz will burst in and try to change something in this sleepy existence of his friend. It is rather difficult to analyze the second part without saying a few words about the first part and the general concept of the novel. It is interesting that the first part of the novel ends with Oblomov's dream, which, as it were [...] ...
Oblomov Ilya Ilyich - the protagonist novel Oblomov. Landowner, nobleman living in St. Petersburg. Leads a lazy life. Does nothing, only dreams and “decomposes” lying on the couch. A bright representative of Oblomovism. Stolz Andrey Ivanovich is a childhood friend of Oblomov. Half German, practical and active. The antipode of I. I. Oblomov. Let's compare the characters according to the following criteria: Memories of childhood [...] ...
The novel by I. A. Goncharov is permeated with various opposites. The reception of antithesis, on which the novel is built, helps to better understand the character of the characters, the author's intention. Oblomov and Stolz are two completely different personalities, but, as they say, opposites converge. They are connected by childhood and school, which can be found in the chapter “Oblomov's Dream”. From it it becomes clear [...]
Plan Introduction The Oblomov family The Stolz family How did the upbringing affect the future life of the heroes? Introduction The novel "Oblomov" by Goncharov does not lose its relevance today, being a brilliant socio-psychological work in Russian literature of the 19th century. In the book, the author touches upon a number of eternal topics and questions, while not giving unambiguous answers, suggesting the reader to find [...] ...
The image of Stolz was conceived by Goncharov as an antipode to the image of Oblomov. In the image of this hero, the writer wanted to present a whole, active, active person, to embody a new Russian type. However, Goncharov's plan was not entirely successful, and, above all, because this type was not represented in Russian life itself. “Stoltsev, people with an integral, active character, in which every thought immediately [...] ...
One of the main themes of Oblomov's book is questions of time. Time in the novel flows differently for different characters and characters. Surprisingly, this is actually what happens. After all, the characters of the book relate to time very differently. The main character, Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, does not like haste. The need to do something according to the clock or to hurry for [...] ...
Plan Introduction Stolz's upbringing Stolz's friendship Stolz's love Conclusion Introduction The image of Stolz in the novel "Oblomov" by Goncharov is the second central male character of the novel, which by its nature is the antipode of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. Andrei Ivanovich stands out from the background of other characters with his activity, determination, rationality, internal and external strength - as if he was “composed of bones, muscles […]...
SOCIAL STATUS Oblomov: Ilya Ilyich comes from a wealthy noble family with patriarchal traditions. In his family, serfs always worked for all family members. Collegiate secretary by rank. Stolz: He comes from a poor family, but thanks to the upbringing that his father gave him, instilling industriousness, dedication - thanks to this, he achieved a lot himself. By rank - outdoor [...] ...
Plan Introduction The beginning of the relationship between Oblomov and Olga The development of the novel by Olga and Oblomov Why was the love story of Olga and Oblomov obviously tragic? Conclusion Introduction Roman Goncharova "Oblomov" can rightly be called a work about love, which reveals different facets of this wonderful feeling. Not surprisingly, the leading storyline of the book is the novel by Olga and Oblomov [...] ...
I know a lot of people who like to be interrupted. Interference serves as an excuse for their own inaction or failure. Let's not look for new words: basically they are lazy. A. Kron Ivan Alexandrovich Goncharov is a remarkable realist writer, whose work has firmly entered Russian classical literature. Its originality consists, according to N. A. Dobrolyubov, in “the ability to grasp the full [...] ...
Plan Introduction Portrait of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov The symbolism of clothing in the image of Oblomov Appearance of Oblomov and Stolz in Goncharov's novel Conclusions Introduction reader. One of the leading literary devices used by Goncharov is the portrait […]...
In Goncharov's novel, the reader is presented with the kind-hearted landowner Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, a lazy and apathetic person to everything, whom nothing can awaken to life. He lies on the couch all day, rarely worrying about anything, being in constant dreams and fairy tales invented by himself. Moreover, Oblomov notices his shortcomings, but does not seek to change himself, only asks the question: [...] ...
Introduction Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the protagonist of the novel Oblomov, an apathetic and lazy man in his thirties who spends all his time lying on the couch and making unrealizable plans for his future. Spending days in idleness, the hero does not begin to do anything, since he is not able to exercise an effort of will on himself and begin to realize [...] ...
Andrei Stolz is Oblomov's closest friend, they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people with such different outlooks on life could maintain a deep attachment. Initially, the image of Stolz was conceived as the complete antipode of Oblomov. The author wanted to combine German prudence and the breadth of the Russian soul, but this idea was not destined to come true [...] ...
“Oblomov's Dream” is a magnificent episode of Goncharov's novel “Oblomov”. In my opinion, a dream is nothing more than an attempt by Goncharov himself to understand the essence of Oblomov and Oblomovism. Goncharov, apparently, felt, as I felt when reading the novel, that Oblomov was sweet and sympathetic to him. Why? For what qualities of the soul? For what actions? Most likely, the writer received the answer to this question from […]
Why is the morally pure, honest Oblomov dying morally? The habit of getting everything from life, without putting any effort into it, developed apathy, inertia in Oblomov, made him a slave of his own laziness. In the final analysis, the feudal system and the domestic upbringing generated by it are to blame for this. How does the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” show the complex relationship between slavery and nobility? Serfdom corrupts […]
In the plot of Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" an important role is played by " love triangle”, consisting of Oblomov, Olga Ilinskaya and Stolz. Olga played a significant role in the life of Ilya Ilyich, for some time awakening him to life. But this heroine connected her fate with Andrei Stolz: she married him shortly after Oblomov’s “escape”. The author shows that Stolz and [...] ...
1. Oblomov - Stolz. 2. Oblomov - Olga Ilyinskaya Stolz - is not a positive hero of the novel, his activity sometimes resembles the activity of Sudbinsky from the despised Stolz of Oblomov's Petersburg entourage: work, work, work again, like a machine, without rest, entertainment and hobbies. His practicality is far from high ideals, he resembles a businessman, a tourist. The image of Stolz is schematic, emotionally faceless. Goncharov [...]
While reading the famous novel by Ivan Goncharov “Oblomov”, it would seem that one should unequivocally condemn the main character Ilya Ilyich, who spent his whole life on the couch in fruitless dreams, unable to do and achieve absolutely nothing. In contrast, it presents best friend Andrei Stoltz and former lover Olga Ilyinskaya, who later married precisely his closest [...] ...
Preparing for the Unified State Examination: Roman "Oblomov". Summary. The action of the novel "Oblomov" takes place in St. Petersburg, on Gorokhovaya Street. The life of the protagonist Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is shrouded in dullness and indifference to everything that happens. He is so accustomed to his hardened way of life that he is too lazy to even get up from his old favorite sofa. Doing household chores is done by his devoted servant Zakhar, [...] ...
In 1859, the great Russian writer Ivan Alexandrovich Goncharov published his second novel, Oblomov. It was a very difficult time for Russia, when society was divided into two parts: a minority and a majority. The minority are those who understood the need to abolish serfdom, those who were not satisfied with life ordinary people in Russia. The majority are landowners, “bares”, wealthy people, [...] ...

Why are Oblomov and Stolz friends all their lives? Write a detailed answer... and got the best answer

Answer from Liudmila Sharukhia[guru]
Oblomov. Stolz. They seem to be completely different people. Oblomov - slow, lazy, not focused. Stolz is energetic, cheerful, purposeful. But these two people love and respect each other, they are true friends. This means that they are not so different, they also have something in common that holds them together.
They had known each other since childhood, since Oblomovka and Verkhlevo, where friends lived, were nearby. But how different was the situation in these two parts! Oblomovka is a village of peace, blessings, sleep, laziness, illiteracy, stupidity. Everyone in it lived for his own pleasure, without experiencing any mental, moral and spiritual needs. The Oblomovites had no goals, no troubles; no one thought about why man, the world, was created. Ilyusha lived among such people - beloved, protected by all. He was always surrounded by care and tenderness. He was not allowed to do anything himself and generally was not allowed to do everything that any child wants, thereby involving him in the essence of an Oblomovite.
In Verkhlevo, it was the other way around. The manager there was Andryusha's father, a German. Therefore, he undertook everything with the pedantry characteristic of this nation, including his son. From the very early childhood of Andryusha, Ivan Bogdanovich forced him to act independently, to look for a way out of all situations himself: from a street fight to carrying out assignments. But this does not mean that the father left Andrei to the mercy of fate - no! He only directed him at the right moments to independent development, the accumulation of experience; later, he simply gave "soil" to Andrei, on which he could grow without anyone's help (trips to the city, assignments). And the young Stoltz used this "soil" and made the most of it. But Andryusha was raised not only by his father. The mother had completely different views on raising her son. She wanted him to grow up not as a "German burgher", but as a highly moral and spiritual, with excellent manners, with "white hands" master. Therefore, she played Hertz for him, sang about flowers, about the poetry of life, about her high calling. And this two-sided upbringing - on the one hand, labor, practical, tough, on the other - gentle, high, poetic - made Stolz an outstanding person, combining diligence, energy, will, practicality, intelligence, poetry and moderate romanticism.
Yes, these two people lived in different environments, but they met as children. Therefore, from childhood, Ilya and Andrei strongly influenced each other. Andryusha liked that calmness, tranquility that Ilya gave him, who received this from Oblomovka. Ilyusha, in turn, was attracted by Andrey's energy, ability to concentrate and do what was necessary. So it was when they grew up and left their native places ...
Time went on and on ... Stolz developed - Oblomov "withdrew into himself." And now they are over thirty years old. What are they?
Stolz is super-energetic, muscular, active, firmly on his feet, amassed a large capital, a scientist who travels a lot. He has friends everywhere, he is respected as a strong personality. He is one of the main representatives of the trading company. Ilya does not travel, like Andrey, abroad, on business, in society. He rarely leaves the house at all. He is lazy and does not like fuss, noisy companies, he does not have a single true friend, except for Stolz. His main occupation is to lie on the sofa in his favorite dressing gown among the dust and dirt, sometimes in the company of people “without bread, without craft, without hands for productivity and only with a stomach for consumption, but almost always with rank and rank.”
These two people are childhood friends. At first, because of this, they were similar and united in many aspects of life. But, over time, when Ilya and Andrei grew up, Oblomovka and Verkhlevo - two opposites - had their effect on them, and friends began to differ more and more. Their relationship endured many blows, nevertheless, childhood friendship held them firmly. But already at the end of their life path, they became so different that further normal full-fledged maintenance of relations turned out to be impossible, and they had to be forgotten.

"FRIENDSHIP AND HOSTILITY"

Official comment:

The direction aims at reasoning about the value of human friendship, about ways to achieve mutual understanding between individuals, their communities and even entire nations, as well as about the origins and consequences of enmity between them. The content of many literary works is associated with the warmth of human relations or hostility of people, with the development of friendship into enmity or vice versa, with the image of a person who is able or not able to appreciate friendship, who knows how to overcome conflicts or sows enmity.

The proposed direction can be considered in different aspects: - friendship between people, the meaning and value of friendly relations in human life; - friendship and enmity between human communities and generations; - friendship or enmity between peoples and the consequences of hostile relations; - friendship between man and animal, etc. The very concept of "friendship" is one of the fundamental in the human worldview and in the system of human values. This confirms the abundance of proverbs and sayings, dedicated to friendship, aphorisms and catchphrases. Starting reflection on the proposed this direction topic, students can build their reasoning based on statements and definitions known to them. Here are just a few of them:

Proverbs : Do not have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends. An old friend is better than two new ones. There is no friend - look for, but found - take care. Friend is known in trouble. To know a friend is to eat a pound of salt together. The enemy agrees, and the friend argues. Make new friends, but don't lose old ones. Good brotherhood is dearer than wealth. In true friendship, it’s like this - disappear yourself, and help a friend out of trouble. Friendship is strong not by flattery, but by truth and honor.

It's easier to lose a friend than to find one. What kind of friendship you make, such is your life. A man without friends is like a bird without wings.

Aphorisms and sayings famous people:

Only a true friend can tolerate his friend's weaknesses. W. Shakespeare Everything will pass - and the grain of hope will not rise, Everything that you have accumulated will be lost for a penny. If you do not share in time with a friend - All your property will go to the enemy. Omar Khayyam

Fulfilling the duties of friendship is somewhat more difficult than admiring it. Lessing

Friendship must be a solid thing, capable of surviving all changes in temperature and all the shocks of that bumpy road along which efficient and decent people make their life journey. A.I. Herzen

People on earth should be friends... I don't think it's possible to make all people love each other, but I would like to destroy the hatred between people. Isaac Asimov

Friendship is like a treasury: it is impossible to draw more from it than you put into it. Osip Mandelstam

Helping students thinkvocabulary work .

So, in the dictionary of S.I. Ozhegov gives the following interpretation of the words "friendship" and "enmity":

HOSTILITY - attitudes and actions imbued with hostility, hatred (irreconcilable enmity; harbor enmity).

FRIENDSHIP - close relations based on mutual trust, affection, common interests (Long-standing friendship; friendship of peoples). In the dictionary of antonyms, these words are presented as an antonymic pair. Dictionaries of synonyms are represented by the following synonymic series:Synonyms for FRIENDSHIP - friendship, friendliness, goodwill, harmony, peace, harmony, familiarity, a short acquaintance, twinning, (good) friendliness, amikoshonstvo, love, fraternization, unity,

communication; friendship is sincere, hypocritical, canine, close. Do something for friendship. To be in friendship, to make friendship, to break friendship, to reduce friendship.Synonyms for HATE - antagonism, malice, hostility, dislike, hatred, hostility, hostility, discord, unfriendliness, discord. Have a grudge against someone. Feed the enmity.

List of references in the direction "Friendship and enmity"

A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin"

M. Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time"

L. N. Tolstoy "War and Peace"

I. S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"

I. A Goncharov "Oblomov"

G. N. Troepolsky "White Bim Black Ear"

A. S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter"

A. P. Chekhov "Kashtanka"

W. Shakespeare "Romeo and Juliet"

Materials for literary arguments.

A. S. Pushkin novel "Eugene Onegin"

Alexander Sergeevich presents his attitude to the partnership to the reader through the characters of the novel"Eugene Onegin" . Two "friends", Onegin and Lensky, in their communication show us that a friend is a very ambiguous and contradictory concept. In the end, we even begin to doubt whether Evgeny and Vladimir are friends or enemies. In the dialogues of the characters, the presence of the author is felt, he is not a simple silent observer, he is a direct participant in the events, we catch his attitude to friendship in the conversations of the characters. The friendship of Onegin and Lensky happened, in the words of Pushkin himself, "there is nothing to do." Indeed, they were completely opposite in character, with different life experiences, with different aspirations.

They were united by the situation in the rural wilderness. Both of them were burdened by the imposed communication from their neighbors, both were smart enough (in relation to Lensky, it would be more correct to say that he was educated). Both heroes are young, so they find common topics for conversation. Friends reflect on Rousseau's "social contract", about science, about moral issues, that is, about everything that occupied the minds of the progressive people of that time. But Pushkin emphasizes the complex relationship between the hero and the society that shaped him. An accidental quarrel (Onegin aroused jealousy in Lensky at the Larins' evening) is only an occasion for a duel. The reason for Lensky's death is much deeper: Lensky, with his naive, romantic view of the world, cannot withstand a collision with life. Onegin, in turn, is unable to resist the generally accepted morality, which says that it is shameful to refuse a duel. Can such a relationship be called true friendship?Regardless of beliefs, each person strives to communicate with his own kind. Only a mentally deranged person can fundamentally run away not from any particular social group, but from people in general. A holy hermit may retire, but he communicates with the whole world, praying for him. The solitude of Onegin was painful for him, and he was glad that at least one person was found with whom he was not disgusted to communicate. Moreover, such communication was necessary for Vladimir Lensky. Onegin was the ideal listener. He was mostly silent, without interrupting the poet, and if he objected, then justifiably, and was interested in the subject of the conversation. Lensky was in love, and like any lover, he needed a person to whom he could pour out his love, especially if poetry was written at the same time, they had to be read to someone. Thus, it is clear that in other conditions Onegin and Lensky would hardly have begun to communicate so closely, but human relationships are special because different situations bring people together and separate them sometimes in a completely paradoxical way. The difference between Lensky and Onegin was not as fundamental as their difference with the neighboring landowners, who considered Lensky half-Russian, and Onegin - a dangerous eccentric and freemason. Speaking extremely generally, Onegin and Lensky were opposites within the same system, and their neighbors generally went beyond the system. That is why Vladimir and Evgeny instinctively found each other and united. That their friendship was superficial and largely formal is proved by their duel. What kind of friend would shoot with a friend, and even in addition, without any explanation ?! In reality, very little connected them, and it was easy enough to break this little.

True friendship is always based on common hobbies and interests, mutual understanding, trust and sympathy. Important is the fact that true friendship is the absence of any competition between people. But precisely such relations did not exist between Onegin and Lensky.
Of course, there would not have been a duel that ended with the death of Lensky, there would have been no tragedy and, as a result, the continuation of the novel. Indeed, according to some researchers (and I agree with them), it was the duel that became the turning point in the fate of Onegin, which made him take a different look at life and rethink a lot.
But the main reason, in my opinion, why the friendship of Onegin and Lensky led to such a tragic denouement is that the relationship between them is not real from the very beginning.

M. Yu. Lermontov novel "A Hero of Our Time"

The theme of friendship is also heard in the novel."Hero of our time" . Is friendship possible in Pechorin's life, and how does the main character understand it?

“Friendship, friendship,” we read from V. Dahl in “ explanatory dictionary living Great Russian language," is the mutual attachment of two or more people, their close connection; in a good sense, disinterested, steadfast affection, based on love and respect ... ”We see such affection in the ingenuous staff captain - the first to tell us about Pechorin. Despite the fact that Maxim Maksimych considers him a strange person and clearly does not approve of what Grigory is doing with Bela, he is attached to Pechorin and considers him his friend: “We were friends”, “there were bosom friends”. Maksim Maksimych's ideas are not justified. Yes, Pechorin does not hide his character from the staff captain and does not promise friendship: “I am a fool or a villain, I don’t know; ... my soul is corrupted by light, my imagination is restless, my heart is insatiable; everything is not enough for me: I get used to sadness just as easily as to pleasure, and my life becomes emptier day by day. During the meeting, it is so cold from Pechorin, Maxim Maksimych is so offended and upset, for the first time he violated the rules for the sake of the meeting: “Am I not the same? .. What should I do? to each his own way ... ".

Pechorin's meeting with Grushnitsky will take place in a completely different way: “We met old friends,” but from the very first lines of the description it is clear that completely different people are hidden under friendly relations. And indeed, Grushnitsky is a man whose main pleasure is to "produce an effect" and who "importantly drapes himself in extraordinary feelings" and plays disappointed. Pechorin, on the other hand, is disappointment itself, this is his illness, and he cannot but feel the artificiality of the Junker and for this reason not accept him: “I understood him, and he does not love me for this.”

Perhaps the theme of friendship is most clearly revealed in A Hero of Our Time in relations with Werner. Perhaps Pechorin could have become friends with the doctor, they are so similar in many ways. From the moment Werner and Pechorin “distinguished each other in the crowd,” their relationship reminds others so much of her. "Werner is a wonderful person", the main character knows the strengths and weaknesses of the doctor perfectly. What brought the two together? “We are rather indifferent to everything, except ourselves”, “we soon understood each other and became friends.” But are they capable of friendship? Grigory denies true friendships, friendship does not exist in Pechorin's life, because it requires self-forgetfulness, openness, trust - all that the protagonist of the novel does not have. He says that "of two friends, one is always the slave of the other," and, quite possibly, this is not a belief, but a desire to hide the inability to let anyone into one's heart.

L. N. Tolstoy novel "War and Peace"

(Andrey Bolkonsky and Pierre Bezukhov)

The first scenes of the novel paint us a very unambiguous, at first glance, picture. So, Prince Andrei Bolkonsky is certainly a welcome guest in secular society. He is handsome, smart, refined, his manners are impeccable, he is politely cold. An ideal combination for a society that, fortunately, does not have the slightest influence on it.

All in the same "picture", Pierre, who appeared, seems to be an unsuccessful caricature of a secular person. He is kind, sincere and disinterested - these, no doubt, excellent qualities already make him a black sheep, because where there is a place for self-interest, big money and hypocrisy, there is no place for spiritual openness. In addition, Pierre is absent-minded and not very attractive in appearance. Trying at first to join this society, to become a part of it, Bezukhov demonstrates not the best manners, which completely discourages sympathy for himself from the majority of the elite.

But behind these images of such different people lies much more than what "light" sees in them.

They are both alien to the society in which they find themselves. Both of them are above him in their thoughts and moral values, only Pierre needs time to understand this. Andrei is confident in his own, special purpose, and an empty, unchanging life is not for him. He also tries to convince Pierre, who is the only one he respects in that environment due to the contrast with the empty elite, to stay away from this life. But Pierre is nevertheless convinced of this on his own, from his own experience. He, so simple and unpretentious, is difficult to resist the temptation.

Despite his simplicity, Pierre is essentially very wise, and this quality is one of the things that make him a close friend of Bolkonsky. Their conversations, in which they share everything that they keep in themselves the rest of the time, have an important influence on the train of thought of both. And even though their positions in some cases are strikingly different, each recognizes the opinion of the other as having a right to exist.

Let each of them go through many ups and even more downs, and Andrei and Pierre, through their disappointments in life, do not harden, but continue to believe in goodness and seek justice. Burned by relations with Helen, Pierre, nevertheless, does not look for the guilty and, which strikes to the core, sincerely, with all his might and to the detriment of own feelings rejoices at the emergence of Andrei's feelings for Natasha. And then, when everything ends, he in no way tries his luck, but only provides disinterested support to Natasha and wholeheartedly wants Andrei to forgive her. It seems that he suffers no less than Andrei himself, and yet his life is meaningless and sulfur for him.

The friendship between Andrei and Pierre can be considered true, beautiful and immortal, because the soil on which it stood was the most worthy and noble. There was not a drop of self-seeking in this friendship, and neither money nor influence was a guideline for any of them either in their relationships or in the life of each separately. This is what should unite people if they live in a society where all feelings can be bought and sold so coldly.

Fortunately, in Tolstoy's novel, these characters found each other, thereby finding salvation from moral loneliness and finding worthy ground for the development of morality and real ideas that should not be lost even by a minority of people.

Pierre considered Bolkonsky "a model of all perfections precisely because Prince Andrei combined to the highest degree all those qualities that Pierre did not have and which can be most closely expressed by the concept of willpower." The friendship between Bolkonsky and Bezukhov passed the test. Pierre was in love with Natasha Rostova at first sight. And Bolkonsky too. When Andrei proposed to Rostova, Pierre did not betray his feelings. He was sincerely pleased with the happiness of his friend. How could L.N. Tolstoy to allow his favorite hero to be dishonest? Pierre showed nobility in relations with Andrei Bolkonsky. His awareness of the relationship between Rostova and Kuragin did not allow him to betray his friend. He did not laugh at Natasha, let alone Andrei. Although he could easily ruin their happiness. However, devotion to friendship, honesty in the heart did not allow Pierre to become a scoundrel.

I. S. Turgenev novel "Fathers and Sons"

In the novel"Fathers and Sons" published in 1862,I.S. Turgenev revealed the image of a new hero of Russian life. Bazarov is a nihilist, a revolutionary democrat. This is a strong personality, able to influence other people. Bazarov is self-confident, endowed with a natural mind, educated. In the novel, he is shown accompanied by a younger, naive and ingenuous friend - Arkady Kirsanov. An analysis of the relationship between the two characters allows us to understand their characters, the strength of their convictions and the strength of friendly affection.

At the very beginning of the novel, Bazarov is not so alone, he has an ally - his friend Arkady Kirsanov. In the first chapters of the novel, Arkady appears as a faithful follower of Bazarov, a student who listens to his teacher with delight and rapture and shares his views on life. Kirsanov Jr. is convinced of the special purpose of Bazarov. Arkady, of course, values his friendship with Bazarov very much, he is proud of him. This is evidenced by his enthusiastic intonations with which he tells his father, Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, about his comrade. Arkady warmly supports Yevgeny in his dispute with Pavel Petrovich. But this is only at the beginning. As the action develops, Arkady gradually cools towards the “raznochinsk views”, which he initially adheres to. Why is this happening? The answer to this question is simple, and the author himself gave it: Turgenev wrote that Arkady basically "sybarized" under the influence of a nature much stronger than himself - under the influence of Bazarov. But the difference between friends was not slow to reveal itself: Bazarov is constantly busy with business, while Arkady does nothing, only sometimes, to unwind, he helps his father. Bazarov is a man of action, which can be seen immediately by his red bare hand. In any situation, in any home, he tries to do his job. His path is the natural sciences, the study of nature and the verification of theoretical discoveries in practice. Bazarov here keeps up with the times, since a passion for science is a typical feature cultural life Russia in the 1860s. Arkady is the absolute opposite. Young man nothing really exciting. All he aspires to is comfort and peace, which runs counter to Bazarov's attitude to life - not to sit back, work, move.

And the characters of those who for the time being call themselves friends are completely opposite: Arkady is soft and kind, Eugene is proud and proud.

It is no coincidence that they say that truth is born in disputes. Indeed, in a novel that is replete with scenes of ideological disputes, sooner or later the positions of the characters are revealed completely and completely. And then, when the attitude of the characters to various issues of the life of society, the life of the human soul, becomes clear, then the polarity of the characters' characters is revealed. Then the question arises about the authenticity of the friendship of young people. After all, friendship implies, first of all, mutual understanding, and in the case of Bazarov and Arkady, it turns out that they lack mutual understanding. In the course of the novel, it turns out that Bazarov ridicules what is so dear to Arcadia: an open manifestation of warm feelings for relatives and loved ones, admiration for the beauty of nature, the ability to be sad and rejoice to the sound of music, enjoy poetic lines ...

Arkady, having discovered for himself that his life convictions are not similar to those of Bazarov, gradually begins to learn to express his opinion, the opposite of the judgments of the nihilist. Once a dispute between friends came almost to the point of a fight. And in the scene when Bazarov, as if jokingly, spreads out “his long and stiff fingers” to close them around Arkady’s neck, and at the same time he grins “ominously”, there is a share of the true attitude of the nihilist to the “chick”. After all, it was precisely the “chick” that Bazarov considered Arkady to be, while always treating him patronizingly. Bazarov understands that Kirsanov Jr. cannot become his associate: “You are a tender soul, a weakling,” he says to Arkady. And he is right - time very quickly puts everything in its place, and Arkady turns out to belong to the old generation, the generation of "fathers". Pisarev very accurately assesses the reasons for the disagreement between Arkady and Bazarov: “Bazarov’s attitude towards his comrade casts a bright streak of light on his character; Bazarov has no friend, because he has not yet met a person who would not give in to him. Bazarov's personality closes in on itself, because outside of it and around it there are almost no elements related to it at all. Arkady would never be able to merge with the ideas of the new century, so his break with Bazarov is obvious.

Bazarov is the leader in this pair. He treats Arkady condescendingly, patronizingly. Kirsanov called his friend a mentor; he "revered his teacher", considered Bazarov "one of the most remarkable people." The still unformed nature of Arkady is entirely under the influence of Bazarov, who, although he is frank with him, always keeps him on the sidelines. Arkady does not notice this and does not understand. He tells Odintsova about his friend "in such detail and with such enthusiasm that Odintsova turned to him and looked carefully."In disputes with Bazarov, Arkady "usually remained defeated, although he spoke more than his comrade." However, this does not bother him in the least, since he sees in Bazarov a man who "has a great future ahead."

I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov"

In the novel"Oblomov" I.A. Goncharov created images of two people, each of whom is in many ways a typical representative of a certain circle of people, a spokesman for ideas that were close to the corresponding strata of contemporary society. Andrey Stolts and Ilya Oblomov, at first glance, seem to have nothing in common, except for memories of childhood games. And yet, no matter how these characters of Goncharov's novel are assessed, it is impossible to deny that they are connected by sincere, disinterested friendship. What's the matter here?

Indeed, Oblomov and Stolz are strikingly different from each other in their way of life. In Stolz's view, the essence of being lies in movement: "Labor is the image, content, element and purpose of life, at least mine." Oblomov, having not yet begun any business, is already dreaming of peace, which he already has plenty of: "... Then, in honorable inactivity, enjoy a well-deserved rest ...".

For a while, Oblomov and Stolz were brought up together - in a school that Andrei's father kept. But they came to this school, one might say, from different worlds: the undisturbed, once and for all established order of life in Oblomovka, similar to a long afternoon nap, and the active labor education of a German burgher, interspersed with the lessons of a mother who struggled to instill son love and interest in art.

It is also important to note how Oblomov and Stolz relate to life in general. According to Oblomov’s own feeling, his existence is more and more like a fruitless wandering in the forest thicket: no path, no ray of sun ... “Someone seemed to have stolen and buried in his own soul the treasures brought to him by the world and life.” Here is one of Oblomov's main miscalculations - he subconsciously seeks to lay responsibility, his failures, his inaction on someone else: on Zakhar, for example, or on fate. And Stolz "attributed the cause of all suffering to himself, and did not hang it like a caftan on someone else's nail," therefore "he enjoyed joy, like a flower plucked along the way, until he withered in his hands, never drinking the cup to that drop of bitterness which lies at the end of all enjoyment. However, all of the above does not yet shed light on the foundations of strong friendship between people who are so different in their habits and aspirations. Apparently, their sincere, warm attitude to each other is rooted in the fact that both Stolz and Oblomov are inherently worthy people, endowed with many high spiritual qualities. They are necessary to each other, because they complement each other so well, they find in each other what is not in themselves.

The friendship between Oblomov and Stolz began during their school years. At the time of their acquaintance, the characters were similar in character and had common hobbies. Little Ilya is depicted as a curious child who was interested in many things. He wanted to learn about the world around him and learn as much as possible of the new, even as a young man he was still preparing for the fact that his life would “take on other, wider dimensions”, he was full of various aspirations and hopes, preparing for an important role in society. However, due to the "hothouse", "Oblomov" upbringing and the influence of relatives, the hero remains in place, continuing only to hope and plan, never moving on to action. All Oblomov's activity passes into the world of dreams and dreams, which he himself invents and lives by.

Little Andrei Stoltz was just as curious a child as Ilya, but he was not limited in his knowledge of the world and was even allowed to leave home for a few days. And if in Oblomov upbringing killed an active, active principle, then the formation of Stolz's personality was influenced by the death of his mother, who dearly loved her son. A strict, unemotional father could not give his son all the love and warmth that he lost after the loss of his mother. Apparently, it was this event, coupled with the need, by order of his father, to leave for another city and build a career on his own, made a strong impression on young Andrei Ivanovich. Mature Stoltz is a person who finds it very difficult to understand his feelings, moreover, he does not understand love, since he cannot grasp it with a rational mind. That is why many researchers compare Andrei Ivanovich with an insensitive mechanism, which is fundamentally wrong - in fact, Stolz is no less sincere and kind person than Oblomov (remember how often and absolutely disinterestedly he helps a friend), but all his sensuality is hidden deep inside his soul, incomprehensible and inaccessible even to the hero himself.

A. Saint-Exupery "The Little Prince"

A speaks about friendship.Saint Exupery right on the first page of your fairy tale"The little Prince" – in dedication. In the author's system of values, the theme of friendship occupies one of the main places. Only friendship can melt the ice of loneliness and alienation, as it is based on mutual understanding, mutual trust and mutual assistance. On earth, the Little Prince learns the real truth that the Fox revealed to him: people can be not only indifferent and alienated, but also necessary to each other, and someone for someone can be the only one in the whole world, and a person’s life “is like the sun will illuminate ", if something will remind you of a friend, and this will also be happiness.

The Little Prince once had a tiny sprout, not like other flowers. Over time, a bud grew on it, which did not open for a long time. When all the petals opened, the baby saw with admiration a real beauty. She turned out to be a difficult character: the guest was a subtle and proud nature. The boy, who took to heart everything that the beauty said, felt unhappy and decided to run away, setting off on a journey.

Telling the story about the flower, the Kid already understood that "it was necessary to judge not by words, but by deeds", - after all, the beauty gave the planet a scent, but he did not know how to rejoice at this and "did not know how to love."

Before the journey, the boy carefully cleaned his planet. When he said goodbye to a beautiful guest, she suddenly asked for forgiveness, wished him happiness and admitted that she loved the Little Prince.

The seventh planet on which the Little Prince ended up was Earth, and it was huge.

At first, the baby did not see anyone on the planet, except for the snake. From her, he learned that not only in the desert, but also among people, it is also lonely. The snake promised to help him on the day when the boy would be sad about his home.

At that moment, Fox appeared. The little prince was going to make friends, but it turned out that the animal must first be tamed. Then “we will need each other ... My life will light up like a sun,” said the Fox.

The fox taught the baby that "you can only learn those things that you tame", and "to tame, you need to be patient." He revealed to the boy an important secret: “Only the heart is vigilant. You can’t see the main thing with your eyes, ”and asked to remember the law:“ you are forever responsible for everyone you tamed. The little prince understood: the beautiful rose is the most precious thing, he gave her all his time and energy, and he is responsible for the rose - after all, he tamed it.

Another important symbol, to which almost the entire work is addressed, is a rose.
The rose is a symbol of love, beauty, femininity. The little prince did not immediately see the true inner essence of beauty. But after talking with the Fox, the truth was revealed to him - beauty only becomes beautiful when it is filled with meaning, content.

The meaning of human life is to comprehend, to get as close as possible to the essence. The souls of the author and the little prince are not shackled by the ice of indifference and deadness. Therefore, a true vision of the world opens up to them: they learn the price of true friendship, love and beauty. This is the theme of “vigilance” of the heart, the ability to “see” with the heart, to understand without words.

The little prince does not immediately comprehend this wisdom. He leaves his own planet, not knowing that what he will look for on different planets will be so close - on his home planet.
People must take care of the cleanliness and beauty of their planet, jointly protect and decorate it, and prevent all living things from perishing. So, gradually, unobtrusively, another important topic arises in the fairy tale - ecological, which is very relevant for our time. It seems that the author of the fairy tale “foresaw” future ecological catastrophes and warned about careful attitude to the native and beloved planet. Saint-Exupery was acutely aware of how small and fragile our planet is. The journey of the Little Prince from star to star brings us closer to today's vision of space, where the Earth, through the negligence of people, can disappear almost imperceptibly. Therefore, the tale has not lost its relevance to this day; therefore its genre is philosophical, for it is addressed to all people, it raises eternal problems.
And one more secret is revealed by the Fox to the baby: “Only the heart is vigilant. You won’t see the most important thing with your eyes... Your Rose is so dear to you because you gave her all your soul... People have forgotten this truth, but don’t forget: you are forever responsible for everyone you tamed.” To tame means to bind oneself to another being with tenderness, love, a sense of responsibility. To tame means to destroy the facelessness and indifferent attitude towards all living things. To tame means to make the world significant and generous, for everything in it reminds of a beloved being. The narrator also comprehends this truth, and for him the stars come to life, and he hears the ringing of silver bells in the sky, reminiscent of the laughter of the Little Prince. The theme of “expansion of the soul” through love runs throughout the tale.
Together with the little hero, we rediscover for ourselves the most important thing in life, which was hidden, buried by all sorts of husks, but which is the only value for a person. The little prince learns what the bonds of friendship are.
Saint-Exupery also speaks of friendship on the first page of the story. In the author's system of values, the theme of friendship occupies one of the main places. Only friendship can melt the ice of loneliness and alienation, as it is based on mutual understanding, mutual trust and mutual assistance.

G.N. Troepolsky "White Bim Black Ear"

The book tells about the dog Bim, who was very loyal and loving friend for his master while they were together. But one day Ivan Ivanovich (that was the name of the owner of Bim) became seriously ill - a fragment left over from the war crawled to his heart, and the owner was taken to Moscow for treatment. And Bim was left alone. How much effort the unfortunate dog spent looking for a friend, how many upheavals, betrayals and insults he had to endure! In the end, he got to the dog-catchers and was locked up in an iron wagon. The next day the owner arrived, but found him already dead in that van, which became a death prison for Beam.

The theme of the story is love for all living things, respect for our smaller brothers, admiration for animals. In the center of all events is the dog Beam of the Gordon Setter breed, the protagonist of the story. Throughout the book, the author admires the intelligence, loyalty and beauty of the dog. Indeed, a person has never had a better friend, and "White Bim Black Ear" proves this once again.

As the inscription at the beginning of the book says, it is dedicated to Alexander Trifonovich Tvardovsky.

The author reveals to the reader the inner world of a dog with all its experiences, joys, questions and misfortunes, and again and again emphasizes the superiority of these animals: “And on the fallen yellow grass stood a dog - one of the best creations of nature and a patient person.” Again, he points out that without these true friends, our life would be much more boring and aimless: “... a split personality in prolonged loneliness is to some extent inevitable. For centuries, a dog has saved a person from this.

The events of the story unfold in the Tambov region - in the city and in the countryside. The year of events is not indicated, but, for sure, post-war times are described.

The story combines a simple, everyday language - devils, rednecks, a fool, a bulldozer; as well as professional hunting words - shuttle, bandolier, hound, arp, setter.

In my opinion, the most striking and memorable moment in the book is the description of the hunt by Ivan Ivanych and Bim. Probably, the author was also a hunter, otherwise who, if not a person with such a passion, can so accurately describe all the events of the hunt.

First of all, Troepolsky admires the pointing dog and its bird stance. Indeed, it is an amazing sight! Previously, a nondescript dog suddenly becomes so elegant, well-coordinated and incomparably beautiful, while maintaining excellent working qualities, which is very important for pointing dogs - so valuable on the hunt! The author writes about Bim's first stance as follows: “And Bim, without lowering his right front paw to the ground, froze in place, froze, as if petrified. It was a statue of a dog, as if created by a skilled sculptor! The first awakening of hunting passion ... against the background of the sunset, he is striking in his extraordinary beauty, which is not given to many to understand.

Again and again, throughout the story, Bim himself, the most important and memorable hero, surprises and falls in love with himself. Of course, it is difficult for a person who has never had a dog to understand and imagine the facial expressions and gestures of a dog, the dog's language, the expression of smart, almost human eyes, but the author easily and clearly describes the movements and actions of the dog, enlivening Bim to the reader and making him almost real. being.

"White Bim Black Ear" makes you think about many things. For example, about the role of a dog in our life. Why is it given to man? So that a person has a devoted friend, ready to serve faithfully until the end of his days, going through all the troubles and misfortunes. Why are people sometimes so cruel to these beautiful animals? Probably, they simply do not understand that a dog is only an outwardly animal, but a human soul lives inside it, and that this creature is very, very necessary for a person, that without him our life will change a lot. We must take care of them, love and not betray, because a dog will never do this - we need to learn something from them.

This story made an indelible impression on me. She once again proved to me that a better friend than a dog to us - people will never find. The author showed us this on the example of Bim, the smartest creature, emphasizing that behind the image of Bim all dogs are hidden, regardless of breed, age and level of upbringing, loving and devoted friends of mankind.

W. Shakespeare play "Romeo and Juliet"

The senseless long-term enmity of the Montecchi and Capulet families prevents the love of Romeo and Juliet. The lovers belong to different clans, they cannot be together. But love is stronger than all obstacles, and only it can put an end to the enmity of two influential families:
The children of the leaders love each other,
But fate sets up intrigues for them,
And their death at the coffin doors
Puts an end to irreconcilable strife.
Because of the endless enmity of these clans, not only lovers suffer, but also other people close to them. Yes, Tybalt cousin Juliet, kills Mercutio in a fight. And then Romeo does not hold back and kills Tybalt, avenging his friend.
Each character in the play is interesting in its own way, but I probably liked Juliet the most. She is only 14 years old, but her feelings for Romeo are not childish at all. For the sake of her lover, she takes decisive steps, contradicts her parents, which at that time was a terrible crime. When a girl realizes that a wedding with Paris is inevitable, she is ready to commit suicide. After all, before that, she had already secretly married Romeo and could not betray her vow of eternal love. Not surprisingly, she is ready to drink the potion and "freeze" for forty-two hours, pretending to be dead.
The thing that struck me the most about the play was the ending. Due to a simple coincidence of events, Romeo did not know that his beloved was alive, and committed suicide from grief at her grave. Juliet, too, could not live without her husband.
I was struck by how fragile human happiness is, how strong the passion of two completely young people can be. An absurd accident ruined the lives of Romeo and Juliet. But their endless love for each other put an end to the long-standing enmity between the Montagues and the Capulets. The heads of these families realized that because of their stupid disagreements, their children died, and it's time to stop.
I believe that love should never be hindered, this is the biggest sin. The heroes loved each other too much, but the world around them is not yet ready for love, kindness, harmony. So they leave.
From Romeo and Juliet you can learn kindness, love, dedication, selflessness, purity. This work has left an indelible mark on my soul. I think I will reread Shakespeare's play over and over again.

On the children's grave, two warring clans forget their grievances. The long-awaited peace is coming to Verona, albeit won at such a terrible price. We can say that the love of young heroes brings prosperity to many people, their homeland.

Therefore, it seems to me that Shakespeare's tragedy "Romeo and Juliet" is characterized by vital truthfulness and a high intensity of passions.

"Oblomov" and "Don Quixote"

Antithesis - the main technique in the work

The value of childhood in the formation of the characters' characters

Childhood of Ilya Oblomov

The childhood of Andrei Stolz

Farewell to home

Two environments, two characters and their influence on each other

The meaning of friendship in Goncharov

The meaning and relevance of the novel "Oblomov"

Introduction

Reasons for friendship between Stolz and Oblomov

Features of friendship between Oblomov and Stolz in adulthood

Conclusion

Introduction

Reasons for friendship between Stolz and Oblomov

Features of friendship between Oblomov and Stolz in adulthood

Conclusion

related posts: